To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
MPs: Flooding responsibility question-marks are unacceptable
Politics.co.uk Staff
31 January 2012, 12:00am
The public accounts committee's chair Margaret Hodge explains the thinking behind its report on flood management:
"Five million properties in England – one in six – are currently at risk of flooding. The annual cost of flood damage is at least £1.1 billion and ageing defences and climate change will increase that bill. So flood protection is a national priority.
"Yet it is unclear where the buck stops and who is ultimately responsible for managing the risk of flooding. There is also a great deal of uncertainty about whether there will be enough money to maintain and improve flood protection in the longer term, and who will pay.
"The department tells us that it is not ultimately answerable and shares the responsibility with the Environment Agency and local bodies. But the eepartment has no way of knowing whether local flood management systems are adequate or when it should step in.
"It is not acceptable that local people should be left in doubt about where responsibility and accountability lie.
"There is a big mismatch between what the Agency reckons it needs to maintain current levels of flood protection and the budget being made available. The department sees more funding coming from local sources – including businesses and local authorities. We are sceptical that this will be possible when local authorities and businesses are themselves under financial pressure.
"All of this is fuelling uncertainty over the future availability and affordability of insurance cover for buildings in areas at risk of flood. The current agreement between the government and the insurance industry runs out in 2013. A new agreement is needed urgently."
More from politics.co.uk
Bring back the family doctor and give every patient their own GP
Unpaid carers deserve action, not just our thanks
Burnham’s ‘small fixes’ could go a long way
Jackdaw approval must be the start of a pipeline of new North Sea projects
UK and Welsh governments must act together to prepare for future wildfires
Covid bereaved families call for Matt Hancock to be removed from Privy Council
Politics.co.uk Newsletters
DAILY
Politics@Lunch
WEEKLY
Week in Review