politics.co.uk Logo

Press Releases

Credit Action: Serious failures in lending practices

Wednesday, 25 Jan 2006 16:49
Disclaimer:
Press releases published on this page are from key opinion formers who promote their organisation's activities by subscribing to a campaign site within politics.co.uk. politics.co.uk does not endorse, edit, or attempt to balance the opinions expressed on this page. The content of press releases are wholly the responsibility of the originating company or organisation.
88% OF CREDIT CARDHOLDERS DID NOT HAVE TO PROVE INCOME
95% DID NOT HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE ABILITY TO REPAY

· Credit card companies setting credit limits in excess of annual income
· UK consumers account for two-thirds of total credit card debt in EU1
· uSwitch.com joins Banking Code Standards Board with call for lending practices to be tightened up

A new study by independent price comparison website, uSwitch.com, highlights serious failures in the lending practices of UK banks when issuing credit cards. With UK credit card debt standing at £56.35 billion, and UK consumers accounting for two-thirds of total credit card debt in the whole of the EU, one of the most shocking statistics revealed by the survey is that nine out of ten credit card borrowers were issued cards without the lender carrying out any checks to verify that they could afford to repay the debt.

The study reveals that the majority of people (88 per cent) who successfully applied for a credit card during the last year were not asked for proof of their annual income beyond the figures stated on the application, and 95 per cent were not asked to show evidence of their outgoings in order to provide a true picture of affordability. This may help to explain why there are more credit cards in the UK than there are people.

Coming just a week after the Banking Code Standards Board (BCSB) announced that voluntary guidelines for the industry should be overhauled to improve the way loans and credit cards are sold to customers, the uSwitch.com study highlights the extent of the reforms needed to restore confidence in the lending practices of UK banks.

Despite many lenders failing to check whether their customers can afford to repay any future unsecured credit card debt, this did not prevent them from sending out 100 million unsolicited credit card application forms in the three months leading up to Christmas, and giving many applicants sizeable credit limits. In some cases, the credit limit can be equal to or in excess of a borrower’s annual income.

For example, out of the people surveyed who were earning between £10,000 and £20,000 p.a., six were given credit limits of between £8,000 and £10,000 – which could amount to 100 per cent of their annual salary.

In one instance, a person earning less than £10,000 p.a. was given a credit limit of between £10,000 and £12,000 – more than their annual gross income. uSwitch.com’s calculations show that this person would need to repay over one third of their monthly take home salary just to meet the minimum repayments on their debt, and would take over 28 years to clear the balance whilst paying £8,600 in interest.

Other revelations from the study include:
· One in three people earning between £10,000 and £20,000 p.a. are given credit limits of between £2,000 and £4,000 – up to 40 per cent of their salary

·One in five people earning less than £10,000 are given credit limits of between £2,000 and £4,000 - more than 20 per cent of their salary

·Of 18 people surveyed who were unemployed at the time, two were given credit limits of between £6,000 and £8,000

·Two people surveyed with earnings between £10,000 and £20,000 p.a. were given credit limits of between £10,000 and £12,000 – which could amount to 120 per cent of their salary

Nick White, Head of Personal Finance at independent price comparison website, uSwitch.com, said: “As consumer debts escalate, there need to be clear measures in place to ensure providers are lending in a truly responsible manner.

“The finding that only one in eight cardholders provided accurate salary or income details during the application process emphasises the significance of the lenders’ failure to conduct proper checks. We are particularly concerned that those applicants least likely to be truthful about their incomes are all from the most vulnerable groups, namely the self-employed, students, the unemployed, and those on low incomes.

“It is time for the banks to put proper measures in place to protect borrowers from over-extending themselves financially.”

Keith Tondeur, Chief Executive at Credit Action, the national money education charity, commented: “These findings are simply alarming. Lenders need to ensure that figures given to them by potential borrowers are accurate - especially for those in the lower income bracket who are much more vulnerable should things go wrong and who may be desperate to borrow because of existing problems.

“It is also vital that lenders strongly encourage all potential borrowers to work out their budgets to ensure that they can realistically afford to repay before going ahead. Asking a few simple questions at the outset would mean that much misery could be avoided."

The Banking Code Standards Board (BCSB) has found some serious failings in the affordability checking regime adopted by providers to approve credit cards and personal loans, and agreed at a Board meeting last week (11 January 2006) that existing guidelines relating to the way these products are sold should be tightened up.

BCSB will be addressing several related issues, including banks failing to close credit cards where debts have been paid off using a consolidation loan, and banks granting loans to individuals based on joint household incomes without ensuring both spouses are aware of the debt.

Speakers' Corner