Press releases and events

Affinities comment on "Cohabiting couples to get marriage-style financial rights"

Affinities logo for press releasesAffinities logo for press releases

Tuesday, 31, Jul 2007 12:00

We wonder what will be the impact upon couples if these proposals are made law? At present couples who marry - and most do so now after a period of cohabiting - know what treatment they can expect if they divorce. If cohabiting couples are to receive similar treatment after say two years of cohabiting, will they be more inclined to split up before the end of two years, or will they actually prolong the period of cohabiting beyond whatever is the qualifying period and be even more deterred from getting married? Our guess is that men will become even more inclined to engage in short term cohabiting relationships, while women will become less likely to accept a cohabiting relationship unless marriage is intended by both parties. We suspect the proposals are just a recipe for more domestic violence, which according to some surveys now accounts for one third of all violent crime. The other aspect of the proposals which are problematic concern children: if the mother of a child is to receive no right to maintenance - there being only a right to a clean break settlement - are the obligations to be placed upon fathers going to be sufficient? Is this being fair to the children who will be second class citizens compared with the children of divorcing couples? The Institute for Fiscal Studies reckons that there are 200,000 more single mothers claiming benefits than there are single parent households, so, presumably, there are possibly around 200,000 fathers who are cohabiting who do not wish to be classified as such. The State seems to be more and more inclined to poke its nose into people's bedrooms, whilst it provides less and less protection to children from domestic violence, by failing to uphold the value of marriage. The mantra "we shall not promote one type of family structure over another" looks less and less tenable, as the State now seems to be saying, "we don't care what type of family structure you want, we are going to impose our rules upon you in any event". Whichever way you look at it, the attempt to escape from morality has failed.

Disclaimer:
Press releases published on this page are from key opinion formers who promote their organisation's activities by subscribing to a campaign site within politics.co.uk. politics.co.uk does not endorse, edit, or attempt to balance the opinions expressed on this page. The content of press releases are wholly the responsibility of the originating company or organisation.

Latest press releases

Affinities applauds RC Mass for Marriages and Sir Alan and Lady Sugar’s Ruby Wedding

Some 650 couples went to mass at the Roman Catholic Westminster Cathedral on Saturday to celebrate the 43,000 years of experience of marriage they have between them.

Affinities says “Forced marriage is here to stay until local authorities fulfil their obligations”

The question is not really about multiculturalism. It should be about what the government is doing to prevent domestic violence and to improve the chances of couples enjoying good relationships. The role of local authorities in marriage preparation and in promoting domestic and social cohesion should be developed

Affinities asks, “poverty – is it the cause or consequence of family breakdown?”

Martin Narey is chair of the End Child Poverty coalition and chief executive of Barnardo's. He was formerly head of the prison service at the Home Office. He has been appointed by Nick Clegg to chair the Liberal Democrats' commission on social mobility because he is seen as an independent, expert voice, Andrew Sparrow reported in the Guardian on Monday 3rd March 2008.

Affinities: Response to Queen's Speech