JRF: "Trying to create a fixed sense of 'Britishness' will not achieve social cohesion"

Addressing deprivation and how people connect is more important for social cohesion than trying to get everyone to adhere to the same fixed notion of “Britishness”. This is according to research published today (21 July) by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. The report also found that limited opportunities for British people in parts of the UK are undermining attempts to ensure new migrants are well received. It found a stark divide between places that are equipped to adapt to new migrants, and places that are not.

The research, Immigration and social cohesion in the UK, found that many people valued their children growing up with cultural diversity. However, some felt that their, and their children’s, prospects were reduced because of immigration – particularly when it came to housing and education.

Lead Researcher Professor Mary Hickman, Director of the Institute for the Study of European Transformations (ISET) at London Metropolitan University, said: “We found that although many British people value the UK for being multi-ethnic and multicultural, poverty and lack of opportunities undermine social cohesion especially in certain parts of our towns and cities. A key factor influencing whether new migrants are accepted is the dominant story in each locality about who belongs there.”

Communities who saw their locality as belonging to everyone tended to be more open to new arrivals. Whereas communities who thought of a locality as belonging to them in particular were more likely to blame new arrivals for problems that often already existed.

The report also looked at feelings of Britishness among both the settled UK population and new migrants in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. It found that minority ethnic long-term residents and new arrivals were the most positive about what was good about Britain.

White English people who were questioned often found it difficult to reflect on their feelings of belonging to Britain, because they had not previously considered it. Whereas people in Scotland and Northern Ireland felt they belonged more to their respective nations than to Britain.

The authors conclude: “The findings of this research go against the grain of the idea that we need a fixed notion of Britishness and British values. Rather, ‘cohesion’ is about negotiating the right balance between difference and unity.”


ENDS

Notes to Editors

1. The full report and findings: Immigration and social cohesion in the UK by Mary Hickman, Helen Crowley and Nick Mai from London Metropolitan University, is available to download for free from www.jrf.org.uk

2. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation is one of the largest social policy research and development charities in the UK. It supports a research and development programme that seeks to understand the causes of social difficulties and explore ways of overcoming them.

3. The research team are members of the Institute for the Study of European Transformations (ISET) at London Metropolitan University. ISET is an interdisciplinary team researching social, economic, cultural and political transformations in contemporary Europe. http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/research-units/iset/

Issued by Charlotte Morris, Senior Media Relations Manager: 01904 615950 / 07800 615105 / charlotte.morris@jrf.org.uk

For enquiries Friday to Monday call Nasreen Memon, JRF Head of Media: 020 7278 9665 / 07812 241 220 / nasreen.memon@jrf.org.uk