IFAW: Images and footage of first fin whales slaughtered in Iceland available now

Friday, 19 June 2009 12:00 AM

Images and footage of the first endangered fin whales harpooned in Iceland this season are available now from the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW).

As the first of Iceland's whaling ships arrived back in port today with two dead fin whales lashed alongside it, the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) again urges the Icelandic government to call off this cruel and needless slaughter now. Whalers aim to kill 150 of the endangered species, along with 200 minke whales, during the 2009 season.

IFAW opposes whaling because it is unacceptably cruel - there is no humane way to kill a whale and research has shown that whales shot with explosive harpoons can take more than half an hour to die.

Opinion polling and independent economic research in Iceland has revealed little or no appetite for whale meat, while responsible whale watching, by contrast, is financially lucrative and one of Iceland's biggest tourist draws.

Robbie Marsland, UK Director of IFAW, said: "We are disappointed that Iceland has pressed ahead with its whaling quotas, despite widespread opposition. We believe it is in the country's own interests now more than ever before not to embark on activities which could damage Iceland's international reputation and its business interests.

"Whaling is cruel, unnecessary and unsustainable. There is little market for whale meat. The best thing for Icelanders as well as for whales would be for the Icelandic government to end whaling now and work instead to protect its valuable whale watching industry."

Whale watching generates almost £5m a year for coastal communities in Iceland.

Ends

For more information or interviews please contact Sigursteinn Masson in Iceland on (00354) 8638361 or Clare Sterling in the IFAW Press Office on +44 (0)20 7587 6708, mobile +44 (0)7917 507717, email csterling@ifaw.org or alternatively visit www.ifaw.org

Notes to Editors:

The current whaling quotas were set earlier this year by the outgoing Fisheries and Agriculture Minister, Einar K Gudfinnsson. He granted commercial whaling quotas of up to 150 endangered fin whales and 100 minke whales a year for the next five years. Iceland's new Fisheries Minister, Steingrimur J Sigfusson, later announced these catch allowances would remain for one year, despite only a limited domestic market for minke whales and no domestic market for fin whales. In recent days the catch limit for minke whales has been increased to 200.

Only 1.1% of Icelanders claim to eat whale meat once a week or more, while 82.4% of 16 to 24-year-olds never eat whale meat (Gallup polling in Iceland, 2006).

According to figures released by the Fisheries Minister to the Icelandic Parliament on February 9, 2009, each minke whale killed during "scientific whaling" from 2003-2007 cost Icelandic taxpayers two million ISK. The total cost for the four-year period was 400 million ISK. From this figure 180 million ISK was given in subsidies to the whalers or 0.9 million ISK per dead whale.

The World Conservation Union Red Book lists fin whales as endangered. The Red Book also estimates that the global population has declined by more than 70% worldwide over the last three generations (1927-2007).

Japan is the only viable market for whale meat exports from Iceland but Japan's own whale meat market is in decline (Marketing Whale Meat - Study on Current and Possible Markets and Cost of Operations in Minke Whaling, Thorsteinn Siglaugsson).

Japan currently has 3,000 tonnes of stockpiled whale meat in storage from previous hunts (Japanese government statistics).

A recent release from the Icelandic Travel Industry Association, issued in January in response to Mr Gudfinnsson's quotas, stated that "minke whaling has already greatly damaged whale watching and there are fewer and fewer animals to be seen in areas in which whale watching boats operate. Whale watching is the sector within the tourism industry which has had the fastest growth in the last few years, including jobs and income for the Icelandic economy. Hence, it is quite clear that this decision will damage the development of the tourism industry, throwing good money after bad".

Tags: