IET: Press ahead with road plans but watch out for limitless toll charges
Monday, 19 March 2012
Following today’s announcement by the Prime Minister on infrastructure investment, Europe’s largest professional society of engineers is urging the Government to press ahead with its plans to increase investment and capacity on the UK’s roads.
Prof Phil Blythe from the Institution of Engineering and Technology, said: “With the Government predicting 40 per cent more traffic by 2025, there is a clear need for new investment and capacity on England’s roads. With no strategy currently in place to deal with this, action is urgently needed.
“The current economic situation means that the Government must look at raising revenue in other ways, something that is common in other utility areas such as gas, electricity and water.
“Technology will be paramount in allowing an increase in capacity, particularly in relation to ‘hard shoulder running’ and managed motorways.”
The IET is also concerned that companies could potentially charge any fee they wish to road users.
Phil Blythe said, “The toll company on the M6 can charge any fee it wishes, and in future this could prove problematic. I think the Government needs to be careful that future toll charge mechanisms are authorised by the DfT. At present, the Government spends between £9 billion and £12 billion on roads, despite raising around £46 billion from road taxes each year.”
Notes to editors:
Interview opportunities are available with IET transport policy experts
The IET’s Road User Charging Fact File can be downloaded at http://www.theiet.org/factfiles/transport/road-user-page.cfm
The IET is Europe’s largest professional body of engineers with over 150,000 members in 127 countries.
For more information, visit www.theiet.org.
Follow the IET on Twitter.
Media enquiries to:
Robert Beahan, Media Relations Manager
T: +44 (0)1438 767336
M: +44 (0)7595 400912
Disclaimer: Press releases published on this page are from key opinion formers
who promote their organisation's activities by subscribing to a campaign site within
politics.co.uk. politics.co.uk does not endorse, edit, or attempt to balance the
opinions expressed on this page. The content of press releases are wholly the responsibility
of the originating company or organisation.
Britain's road network will be opened up to investment from the private sector, David Cameron will announce later.
Prime minister David Cameron is delivering his speech on infrastructure, which includes a call to introduce private sector investment into the UK's national road network. Read it in full here:
The shadow transport Chris Grayling argues the government is out of touch over the "pie in the sky" national road pricing scheme. He argues the 1.8 million people who signed an anti-road pricing petition were right to oppose an unrealistic scheme that should not be forced on local authorities.
The Liberal Democrats want to charge drivers to use motorways as part of a commitment to making Britain carbon neutral by 2050.
The Liberal Democrat transport spokesman Alistair Carmichael calls on drivers to ignore the "myths" surrounding road pricing. The facts include rising congestion and a rising threat to the economy and environment and maintain the status quo is no longer feasible.
Mayor of London Ken Livingstone predicted this week that Gordon Brown will push ahead with a road pricing scheme as prime minister.
MPs will get their first chance to comment on road pricing as plans that would allow local pilot schemes are published by the Department for Transport (DfT).
Adam Price, Plaid Cymru parliamentary transport spokesperson, explains why Plaid support road pricing in principle, pointing to the success of congestion charging and small-scale road pricing schemes. But he questions whether a UK-wide scheme would meet Wales' unique transport needs.
The vast majority of motorists say the government cannot be trusted to deliver a fair road pricing system, a poll suggests.
The debate over road pricing looks set to be revived after the Conservative chair of the energy and climate change committee demanded the change.