Home

UKIP repays £18,000 in illegal donations

UKIP relieved at rulingUKIP relieved at ruling

Tuesday, 07, Aug 2007 12:00

The UK Independence Party (UKIP) has been ordered to forfeit more than £18,000 in donations after a court ruled it broke electoral guidelines.

Westminster Magistrates Court said the donations were impermissible because one donor was not on the electoral roll and another company was registered to the Isle of Man.

The Electoral Commission had originally ordered UKIP to repay more than £350,000 in illegal donations but this was today overruled by the court, which said UKIP had acted negligently.

The political party received £363,697 from businessman Keith Brown between December 2004 and January 2006.

However, during this time Mr Brown was not on the electoral roll, meaning UKIP breached rules banning donations from foreign benefactors.

Mr Brown did not know he had been removed from the roll until December 2005 and he was reinstated the following February.

Senior district judge Tim Workman agreed today UKIP should only forfeit funds paid during this latter period – amounting to £14,481.

But he warned the party it had not carried out sufficient checks, although agreed the breach was accidental.

UKIP has also been ordered to forfeit £4,000 donated by the company Nighteck, as it is registered on the Isle of Man.

The money goes to the government rather than not back to the donors, although Mr Brown has said he will replace his forfeited donation.

Speaking after the ruling, UKIP leader Nigel Farage said he was relieved the Electoral Commission's original ruling, which risked bankrupting the party, was overturned.

Mr Farage said: "We have said right from the start that we as a party should have checked whether Alan was on the electoral register, not just taken his word for it.

"It was entirely disproportionate for the Electoral Commission to seek the forfeiture of the whole amount.

"We may have broken the letter of the act but we did not break the spirit of the act."

The Electoral Commission has spoken of its disappointment at the ruling.

In a statement it said: "We will study the judgement carefully and will consider whether to appeal.

"Public confidence in our democracy depends on political parties abiding by the rules."

The case marked the first legal challenge to the commission's interpretation of the 2000 Political Parties, Elections and Referendum Act.

The Liberal Democrats and Conservatives have both repaid tens of thousands in illicit donations.


What do you think ?

Name 

Town/Country 

Your email 

Your comment 

Enter the text shown to the right

Our new look

We hope you find our new design easier on the eye and to navigate than the old design. Read more about the new site

Newsletter

Sign up to politics.co.uk’s daily newsletter and you’ll never miss a key political story again

Opinion Formers

Electoral Reform Society

The Electoral Reform Society is a voluntary organisation that campaigns for a better democracy, particularly through changes to our electoral system.

Opinion Former Comment

CML director general addresses annual conference

I have fifteen minutes in which to describe the events in the most momentous year ever in the UK financial services sector. The housing and mortgage markets have been daily news, and centre stage in politicians’ minds and actions.

Related Analysis

Analysis: Glenrothes result

Labour are resurgent. The SNP train has hit a brick wall. But what does Glenrothes mean for UK politics?

Analysis: Glenrothes result

Latest Headlines

Queen opening parliament

The Queen will open parliament later today, surrounded by the pomp and ceremony of the opening of parliament.

The state opening of parliament occurs today

Issue briefs

Labour Leadership

What is the Labour leadership? The Labour party leader heads the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) and is appointed as prime minister when the party holds a majority in the House of Commons.

Speakers Corner