politics.co.uk Logo

News

SNP: We won't accept independence 'no' vote

Wednesday, 16 Jul 2008 11:37
The comments will be considered incendiary in some parts of the UK
The Scottish National party (SNP) candidate for Glasgow East provoked anger and confusion yesterday by insinuating the party would keep on holding referendums on Scottish independence until it got the answer it wanted.

"When you ask someone to marry you, sometimes you have to persist," said John Mason.

He then quickly asserted that he did not expect another referendum "the following day" if the nationalists lose the next one.

The view contradicts statements made by his party leader, Alex Salmond, who described independence referendums as a "once in a generation" event.

Mr Mason is considered a hard-liner in the SNP, but he has made distinct efforts to appear unified with Mr Salmond's command.

It is the first time independence issues have had an impact on the by-election, in which Labour's strong 12,000 majority is under threat from a galvanised nationalist campaign.

David Cairns, the Scotland Office minister, said: "These comments prove councillor Mason is more hard line than Alex Salmond. He is the extreme face of nationalism.

"It demonstrates he is obsessed by one issue only, to the exclusion of the concerns of ordinary people in the East End."


Related Opinion Formers 

  • Electoral Reform Society

    The Electoral Reform Society is a voluntary organisation that campaigns for a better democracy, particularly through changes to our electoral system.  Full Story

Comment on this story... 

Name 

Town/Country 

Your email 

Your comment 

Enter the text shown to the right

Your views 

  • Joe Middleton, Edinburgh: Shumba, if you don't know the difference then you should be ashamed of yourself. Mugabe is beating up and murdering his opposition and saying he will hold power no matter what the voters say. The SNP are saying that if a referendum fails then they would still keep pushing for another one. That doesn't mean they wouldn't respect the result, they would. They wouldn't claim Scotland was independent without the backing of the people. They would however be trying to keep the issue on the agenda and when the time was right and if they had the power to do it the SNP would of course try again. This comes as no surprise to anyone in Scotland, nor should it. The SNP are committed to Scottish independence that is the whole point of the party and they won't give up on it until it happens. Salmond said it was a 'once in a lifetime' thing in his opinion, however that is just his opinion. The SNP is a democratic party controlled by it's membership. Salmond is party leader but if he gave up on independence for whatever reason or tried to kick the issue into the long grass (after a referendum for example) he wouldn't remain the leader for long.
  • Shumba, Cheshire: and the difference between this and Zimbabwe is ?
  • Talorthane, Glasgow: Elections happen every 4 or 5 years, and parties put their manifestos to the people, who then decide on the contents. But a referendum will only take place when the SNP win a particular election. If the electorate don't want another referendum then they stop voting for the SNP; if it's not the problem to the electorate that the press make it out to be, then they will keep voting for the SNP. By the logic of your argument, the Lib Dems (in particular) should have folded years ago; as they have never won an election, but neither have they achieved the support for their federal system as proposed in their manifestos.

Related news