Minister withdraws criticism of judges

Vera Baird withdraws criticism of judgesVera Baird withdraws criticism of judges
 
 

Related News

Falconer defends judges in sentencing row

Politicians should stop criticising judges for sentencing decisions when they are only following official guidelines, the lord chancellor has said.

Lord Falconer says judges should not be blamed for sentencing row
 

Tuesday, 20, Jun 2006 12:00

A junior minister was forced to apologise to the lord chancellor last night for criticising judges over sentencing policy.

Constitutional affairs minister Vera Baird said a judge who handed out a five-year minimum sentence for sexually assaulting a three-year-old had "got the formula wrong".

Her comment reflect a statement by home secretary John Reid that the tariff handed down to Craig Sweeney was "unduly lenient", but contradicted that made by Lord Falconer – her boss – two days earlier.

"I should not have made those comments on the case following your statement outlining the clear position of the government," wrote Ms Baird, the MP for Redcar.

"Accordingly, I withdraw them and fully support the government's position, both on this case and on the broader issues of sentencing."

In his reply, Lord Falconer said the retraction brought the matter to an end, and said he had "complete confidence" in Ms Baird's ability to do the job.

"I believe that, as a new minister in this department, you have much to contribute to the government and the Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA)," he wrote.

"I value you as a member of the government and of the ministerial team at the DCA. I have complete confidence in your continuing role."

Ms Baird's original comments came amid a major row about the government's sentencing policy, prompted by the Sweeney case but made worse by the Home Office admission that 53 people given life sentences since 2000 have since been freed on licence.

She told Any Questions on BBC Radio Four: "The way [the judge] halved the [minimum] sentence from 12 to six years is wrong."

The QC added: "I'm critical of the judge for three reasons - starting too low; deducting too much for the guilty plea; and getting the formula wrong."

However, earlier in the week Lord Falconer had insisted it was not the judge who was wrong but the sentencing guidelines under which he had to operate.

"We have to be extremely careful that we don’t attack the judges on these issues where it is the system – and it is not one or other political party – it is 30 years of statutes that have led to this," he said.

The lord chancellor subsequently launched a review of sentencing policy, and Tony Blair is expected to make an announcement this week.


What do you think ?

Name 

Location 

Email 

Comment 

Enter the text shown to the right

UK's No.1

We are the UK's leading dedicated political news website. Find out how you can get your message across to our audience of opinion leaders and policy makers.

Newsletters

Stay up to date with the goings on both in UK politics and on politics.co.uk by signing up to our daily newsletter, public affairs newsletter and jobs bulletin.

Public Affairs Jobs

Check out politics.co.uk's new jobs section, for government, public sector and public affairs roles

Current Vacancies:


Latest Headlines

Parties battle for pink vote as Gay Pride hits London

Labour and the Conservatives are engaged in an ugly battle for the pink vote as London prepares to host the annual gay Pride celebrations this weekend.

The pink vote: Going blue?

Speakers Corner