Lib Dems 'declare war on inequality'

Lib Dems will try get £2 million more people in employment by 2020. Lib Dems will try get £2 million more people in employment by 2020.

Wednesday, 19, Sep 2007 12:00

The Liberal Democrats claim they can lift five million children out of relative poverty by 2020.

Delegates at the Lib Dem conference in Brighton approved the party's poverty and inequality policy paper, which advocates education and employment opportunities with incentives to work and save.

Introducing Freedom from Poverty, Opportunity for All, Lib Dem work and pensions spokesman Danny Alexander said the Labour government had fostered a society with massive inequalities in income and opportunity.

However, he attacked Gordon Brown's strategy for relieving poverty as a "blueprint for a state of dependency".

Liberal Democrats agreed on targets for getting two million more people into employment by 2020, aided by a switch away from means-tested benefits.

Mr Alexander said: "Our radical new agenda rejects Gordon Brown's blueprint for a state of dependency, where the spread of mass means-testing undermines incentives to work, save and even form stable families.

"Labour has failed to provide real opportunity for the most disadvantaged. Britain is becoming divided into two nations. With these policies, the Liberal Democrats are declaring war on inequality."

Liberal Democrats agreed to reform the Tax Credits system, which has been blighted by over-payments and complications.

They also said job centres were "failing" and local charities and companies should be used to find people work.

New workers should also continue to receive benefits for two weeks after starting work. The Lib Dems reaffirmed a commitment to spending on mental health to reduce the number of people on incapacity benefit.

Delegates also approved the much-previewed "pupil premium" scheme, which will allocate extra funding for the most disadvantaged pupils.

Schools and families spokesman David Laws said: "Our aspiration is that the most deprived pupils have the same financial backing as those privileged enough to go to private school."

The Liberal Democrats also argued for extra funds to train early years teachers.

In addition, the paper contains proposals for a million more affordable homes by 2020.

Councils should be allowed to sell off properties on large estates and use the proceeds to reinvest in social housing. Tenants should then be placed on introductory tenancies to discourage anti-social behaviour.

The Liberal Democrats looked beyond deprived inner cities and promised to "rural proof" all anti-poverty policies. Rural services such as the Post Office network must be protected, they said.

While focusing on poverty, the Liberal Democrats have refused to echo David Cameron's claims of a "broken society". Addressing the conference on Monday, Menzies Campbell said he retained an optimistic view of Britain.


Analysis


Video

Audio



Poll

Budget 2010

Chancellor Alistair Darling is drawing up the Budget, which he will deliver on Wednesday March 24th.

This year's Budget comes just weeks before the general election

Fringe Events

politics.co.uk Blog

  • Politics.co.uk named best politics website!!!

    NO REALLY!!!!!

    We're not prone to bragging all that often over here at politics.co.uk towers.

    No honestly we're not!! No really honest!!

    But we can't quite help ourselves on this one. The only thing is….we can't quite work out how this little piece of praise from the Sunday Times slipped through the net, we're usually much better at monitoring when we get a mention in the national newspapers.

    And this one's a cracker!!

    Naming its top five politics websites in the February 14th edition of the Sunday Times, politics.co.uk is the top website to be mentioned.

    The article says:

    "Politics and the internet are a combustible mix, with many websites so partisan they may as well be manifestos. At least one seemingly independent blog draws private support from a wealthy figure in the Conservative party."

    But there are sites and blogs that entertain while dodging any overt political allegiance.

    1 politics.co.uk

    Promising balanced coverage and impartiality, this features around 300 stories written for the site every month. Its collection of “briefings & guides” is a bit like a set of political pass notes, covering everything from Gulf war syndrome to tobacco advertising.

    The list of best websites also includes BBC political editor Nick Robinson's blog, Mayor of London Boris Johnson's blog, the US conservative website townhall.com and er...

    timesonline.co.uk.

    Ah who cares? We're number one! 
  • Not all those on the left fear a Labour implosion

    With a general election looming - how many more times can I use the word 'looming' with regard to general elections without losing the last vestiges of journalistic self-respect? - the unions are making life for the Labour government pretty hellish.

    Perhaps they forget how much worse things would be under a Conservative government. I recently attended a rally of the striking Public and Commercial Services union which suggested feelings towards Labour ministers was something akin to a hatred born of a fundamental betrayal. Apart from a few warning notes here and there, the alternative was barely considered.

    Now the unionist 'militant tendency', as the absurd Tory-driven attempt to drag up the past would have it, is placing Gordon Brown under huge pressure. This could all work out alright, if the prime minister manages to come up with a deal before time runs out. But confrontation seems much more likely to remain unresolved. David Cameron has been handed an unlikely boost in his quest to oust the PM from No 10.

    The left's tendencies to ruin their own chances throughout recent decades are well-documented enough. And, it is now becoming clear, many of those in the socialist 'campaign group' on the far-left are beginning to think their prospects might be boosted by a resurgence of militancy.

    For those who hanker over the good old days, a strong Tory majority and hardline approach to the strikers could lead to many of the older Labour MPs, who have stayed quiet under New Labour, to be polarised themselves.

    In this scenario the Labour party could find the gulf between its left and central wings growing wider and wider. Bridging it will be a tough task for any leader, that's for sure.

    What is so striking - forgive the pun - is how enthusiastic those who are committed to fostering a stronger loony left actually are. A slim Tory majority could cement its position in a quick follow-up election as Labour's cohesiveness slips further and further. 
  • The party that gets in your head

    It's been six or so decades since the Liberals were last in power, so they have come up with a new tactic for making that ever-elusive 'breakthrough'.

    This time round it's a variant on that old chestnut, the campaign song. How could they possibly find anything more gut-wrenchingly, jaw-droppingly, facial-contortingly awful than D:Ream's Things Can Only Get Better?

    Our llittle orange friends have succeeded where musical scientists had failed. By enlisting the help of the Liberal Democrat Community Choir their words of wisdom will have you howling along forthwith.

     
  • Clegg in City grovelling shock

    Nick Clegg began his speech to the City this morning in an unexpected way: with a "grovelling" apology.

    Could it be the Lib Dem leader is finally making up to the bankers after 12 months of sticking it to them at every opportunity?

    No - it turned out he was just sorry for being 28 minutes late.

    There were some in the room who suggested Clegg was not quite important enough to be worth hanging around for.

    But his excuses were well worth the wait.

    He didn't bother proclaiming something breezily about matters of state, or privy council, or high-level talks. It was just that he was - how to put it - late.

    "Firstly, grovellingly embarrassed apologies," he began. "It took me two hours to get across London... I've been tearing my hair out, not least listening to Ken Clarke and Liam Byrne talk about the deficit."

    If the City folk gathered to listen to his wise words had harboured hopes he might switch his banker-bashing tendencies to something more muted, they were destined to be disappointed, however.

    Clegg compared Britain to Iceland, backed a ten per cent levy on banks' profits and said "balance" needed to be restored to reduce the influence of the City's "vested interests". He certainly wasn't sorry about that. 
  • A brain dump

    A wave of jargon is sweeping across the public sector. If coterminous thinking outside the box is not immediately meaningfully dialogued, plain English champions are warning there is a grave danger the government will go bottom-up.

    This paradigm has only been uncovered following a brain dump from the Local Government Association, whose engagement in blue-sky thinking on the problem of better sense-capacity offers the best hope for winning headroom for change.

    "The public sector must not hide behind impenetrable jargon and phrases," the LGA's fast-tracked fulcrum of functionality, councillor Margaret Eaton, explains. This iteration is cautiously welcomed by most, for surely local authority catalysts have already actioned area-focused steps?

    Alas, predictors of beaconicity appear to have taken a deep dive. Ms Eaton's knowledge bite shows just how far from a level playing field the direction of travel currently is.

    "Why do we have to have a 'webinar trialogue for the wellderly' when the public sector could just 'talk about caring for the elderly' instead?" she asks.

    Ms Easton's efforts to create leverage by engaging users are compact and full of cross-fertilisation, but one questions whether she has a full appreciation of the cashable cohesiveness her demands imply.

    After all, civil servants, whether interdepartmental or cross-sectoral, have a can-do culture where benchmarking and incentivising offer an early win. Has she had enough face-time to edge-fit her innovative capacities? One fears her conclusions may form a low-light, not a baseline benchmark of best practice.

    Undeterred, her horizon-scanning continues nonetheless. "Any organisation that spends taxpayers' money has a duty, not only to provide value for money to local people, but also to tell them what they get for the money they pay," she says. "People would be furious if they had no idea of what services their cash is paying for and how they should get to use them."

    Wait! Perhaps her extensible pursuit of learning outcomes offers some meaningful reusable interactivity, after all. We propose a menu of options which could help provide improvement levers.

    Firstly, clients could receive a core value compendium from a combination of pooled budget, pooled resources and pooled risk. But there are fears a swimming pool to help the mandarins calm down might distort spending priorities. So a quick dip in the revenue streams might prove more joined-up.

    Alternatively, a transformational trajectory could be provided by a thought shower. Again, there may be disbenefits. The idea of naked civil servants wallowing in their own self-aggrandizement probably offers a bit too much transparency.

    We must discount outright the desperate final option. The least said about pump priming the better.

    "We do not pretend to be perfect," Ms Eaton continues, a little desperately, before adding that "we are striving to make sure that people get the chance to understand what services we provide".

    We are all agreed, then: without future proofing against this verbose threat no one is safe. Significant slippage in wordy standards has been reported. This is a step-change for the worse. All the signposts suggest there is no quick win towards normalisation. Besides, they haven't been tested for soundness.

    Britain's governors face a problem which must be solved across-the-piece, otherwise the next generation of facilitators will face a real hereditament.