ModernityBlog

Tuesday, 09, Feb 2010 07:57

Blog site:

http://modernityblog.wordpress.com/
Political Party:

n/a
Information:

ModernityBlog is appalled by any form of dictatorship, or the threat of it.


His opposition to fascism in Britain and non-democratic regimes abroad go hand in hand, and are somehow consistent with the very cynical approach taken to the Conservative party too.


The blog is very good at picking out relevant stories on these themes and is a useful source as such.


There's also a strong vein of technology-related posts in among the politics too.
Biography:

The author's blog is very modest, unlike them, it mostly contains their mutterings at 3am in the morning, after they've done their chores and any other stray thoughts that enters their, increasingly feeble, mind before bedtime.


If you want cogent arguments, lucid reasoning or profound intellectualism then please look at their blogroll, not their blog.
Rating:

7/10
Latest Posts:
Loading RSS

Want to submit your blog?

Name 

Town/Country 

Your email 

Name of your blog 

Blog site 

Enter the text shown to the right

Want to review this blog?

Name 

Town/Country 

Your email 

Name of your blog 

Blog site 

Enter the text shown to the right

Recently Added Blogs

Mike Flower

Mike Flower is notching up some useful experience on his local Tory-run Cabinet.

politics.co.uk Blog

politics.co.uk blog

Read the latest blog posts from the editorial team at politics.co.uk

  • Politics it's a funny old game

    Who would be a politician at the moment? Honestly?

    If it's not Austin Mitchell appearing on Channel 4 and proving that despite being a Labour politician he has absolutely no idea what the poor have to live on, and more importantly appearing to not care all that much, it's Harriet Harman being given 25/1 odds on for rear of the year. And let's not forget Quango Directgov getting it wrong when naming part of its website Buster's World – aimed directly at children but with the same name as a gay porn website, which appears higher on Google because it's been around a while longer. Someone surely has a sense of humour over at DirectGov I bet the market research that went behind the name for that little gem costs a pretty penny too.

    One wonders why they do it.

    Last night's Tower Block of Commons - fast becoming my favourite TV show - managed to show just how out of touch Labour really have become. Mitchell seemed to think a dinner party in a council flat with the local Birmingham MP would help solve the problems of the people living in said council block - including the family he was ostensibly supposed to be staying with, but refused point blank to.

    Of course it might but I'm thinking flats that aren't falling apart, microwaves that actually work without having to be hit with a hammer, beds and other furniture and the opportunity for dad Dave, a qualified chef, to be able to ply his trade might be of more help. What's more confusing about this is that Mitchell is not a young man and, one expects, did not come from a privileged background. So how on earth could he have completely forgotten his roots?

    His utter refusal to try to work with the producers of the programme in the way that had been outlined to him, to try and live on the same amount of money as someone on benefits in some of Britain's worst sink estates, not only made him look utterly ridiculous but massively arrogant and utterly disrespectful towards the people that actually have to live on such meagre handouts. Don't think I'm getting all loony leftie on you; I'm just saying that the people involved in the show were, for the most part, far from benefit scroungers that the Daily Mail might have you believe Britain is infested with.

    They were families struggling to make ends meet and not one of the MPs involved in the documentary has so far come out of the experience looking all that good. Good thing some of them - Mitchell and Mark Oaten, for instance - are retiring really. I'm not sure this programme would have helped them much. Take note Nadine Dorries and Tim Loughton. Although of the two Loughton just about came out of last night's episode with a little bit of dignity still intact.

    Then there's the case of Harriet Harman being in the running for the rear of the year award famously won by the likes of Charlotte Church and Rachel Stevens in the past. One wonders how the arch feminist and champion of equality feels about such a nomination and whether some of her more cheeky colleagues couldn't help themselves in nominating the deputy leader of the Labour party as she seeks to guide her equality bill through its final stages in the House of Commons. I wouldn't be surprised if a few Tory members thought this would be a great wheeze themselves and decided to add their names to the nominations. If the Sun has its way she'll probably win. After all, 25/1 are far better odds than I would have expected her to get.

    And why oh why does this government continue to shoot itself in the head? What a wonderful juxtaposition we had in today's press. On one page Harman is being nominated for rear of the year; on the next directgov is in hot water because it names part of its website after someone else's gay porn balloon fetish website. You couldn't make it up!

    All in all a strange day in the world of politics. Let's try not to forget the serious business going on at the moment. What's that I hear you say? Gordon Brown has just nominated Caroline Flint for Playboy's playmate of the year?
     

  • Some well-earned applause

    Sir John Chilcot and co will have been especially gratified by the public gallery's spontaneous applause at the close of today's session.

    Perhaps it was euphoria at having made it through nearly four hours of evidence from the former secretary Jack Straw, but the audience seemed distinctly pleased after Sir John passionately - by civil service standards, at least - reaffirmed his determination to do a good job.

    His statement rebutted many an accusation levelled at his panel by the media in recent weeks: the inquiry was "committed to being open and transparent"; "we have no reason to believe any material is being deliberately withheld" by the government; and "the inquiry has broken new ground".

    I've been a member of the audience two or three times so far and have noticed one or two familiar faces each time. These committed individuals tell me they're impressed by the panel's work and are more dismissive of journalists than the non-forensic nature of the questioning.

    As one pointed out, the purpose is to get new facts to come to light; there has been some success here.

    Perhaps more importantly, the questioning has been getting more and more forensic recently. Today's session - especially the scintillating 40 minutes - was riveting as Straw wriggled on the hook of legal advice for the war.

    "Nicely done," Lawrence Freedman whispered to Sir John as the applause died away, the grins showing on all five of the panel's normally serious-looking faces.
     

  • The subtle arts of the lobby

    There is a subtle art to asking the prime minister's spokesman questions.

    Some rules of thumb are very clear. Asking reshuffle questions is a complete waste of time; these are hypothetical and so easily brushed away. And queries about the state of the economy are also folly if a Budget or Pre-Budget Report is coming up.

    What is slightly less clear are party political questions. The way this works in Downing Street is more than a little strange: Gordon Brown's political activities are utterly divided from his governing ones. The prime minister's spokesman speaks on behalf of the government; he is a civil servant, not a party apparatchik.

    My problem is that this is damaging to No 10 - very damaging. In this afternoon's lobby briefing, for example, the prime minister's spokesman was invited to respond to Liam Fox's claims that Mr Brown was 100% wrong on his statement about the 2005 manifesto featuring promises of cuts. In fact, Dr Fox says, the Tories were seeking a £2.7 billion increase in defence spending.

    This is a party political matter, we were told. So Dr Fox's criticisms went unanswered. We can of course ring up No 10 and ask to speak to the "political colleagues". But most of those in the room won't have done, and come away with a worse impression of the PM than before.

    Not that they hadn't already made up their minds, of course.
     

  • Ken baffled as never before

    I've just come from a rather bizarre trip to north London, playing the part of a panel show guest with Ken Livingstone in the chair.

    The former London mayor, once king of all he surveyed from City Hall, now spends two afternoons every month presenting a book review programme on Press TV.

    This was an opportunity not to be passed up. A pleasant 23 minutes was passed discussing Cambridge historian Ben Wilson's third book, What Price Liberty?, which comes out in paperback this week.

    More interesting, of course, was experiencing first-hand Ken's small-talk treatment.

    The man is legendary. Within the space of around 15 minutes we covered everything from Vince Cable's Labour past to 70,000-year-old volcanic eruptions.

    He was happy to admit he was an expert at having opinions on things, even if he didn't fully understand them.

    The only exception to this appeared to be the general election. On this, as never before, he said, he did not have the foggiest who would come out on top. It's tough being a spectator, but Ken is doing his best at it - in his own inimitable way.
     

  • We're still on for May 6th

    Ladbrokes has slashed its betting on a February general election from 66/1 to a mere snip at 25/1, following a rush of bets on a snap winter poll.

    The logic behind this thinking is that, despite slipping back in the most recent opinion polls, Gordon Brown is hoping the wave of euphoria over the end of the recession will cause the electorate to welcome Labour back into government with open arms.

    No one really knows when the election is going to be called, although at his monthly press conference this morning the prime minister did display distinct smugness as he explained it was his "privilege" to name the date.

    Brown would be mad to plump for a February poll. Apart from anything else Labour relies on turnout far more than the Tories. With the weather displaying definite tendencies towards disruption No 10 strategists will be more than aware of its off-putting effect. Even a rainy day is bad news.

    As a result the most likely date by far remains May 6th. That's the Thursday when local elections take place and is perfectly-timed for an Easter kick-off.

    The real lesson from today's speculation is how temperamental the betting markets can be. Brown's strong polling performance led to intense speculation around the new year that an early election would be called; it melted away as surely as the snow has.

    The most likely scenario is today's flicker of interest will meet exactly the same fate.
     

Pick of The Blogs

A Big Block of Cheese

This unashamed Labour leaning blog tells you everything you need to know about politics in an intelligent and no nonsense form.

A Big Block of Cheese - politics.co.uk

MP Blogs

Sadiq Khan

An interesting and passionate politican, Khan's blog fails for the same reason as most Cabinet level bloggers: it's boring.